So who does Quest for the Ring like in this year's NBA Championship between the Boston Celtics and the Los Angeles Lakers? Both teams are extremely well owned, managed and coached and both teams are true to basketball and don't try to twist the game into something it is not. So we are happy whichever team wins.
We are happy to say the least. This year sure as hell beats last year when the Nuggets were threatening to appear in the Championship with their football approach to basketball and their coach way out in right field or left field (I’m not sure which, laugh out loud). Even though the Nuggets were eventually demolished by the Lakers in an elimination game in their own building 119-92, that experience of contemplating that the poorly coached Nuggets might actually be in the Championship was horrifying and miserable and will not be forgotten for a long time.
The top two factors we use to declare who we most want to win this year:
--On the superstar guard front, Kobe Bryant has four rings and Rajon Rondo has only one. Rajon Rondo was better than Kobe Bryant this year. Plus, Rajon Rondo and company bounced LeBron James from the playoffs and got the Cleveland coach fired (and the more coaches who can't coach well in the playoffs who get fired the better). Yes, Mr. Rondo deserves number two much more than Kobe deserves number five.
Also, as a side factor, Derek Fisher of the Lakers has four rings already and that's plenty. He will be the worst player among the ten starters. I know he is Phil Jackson's "coach on the court," but he just is too far in the shadow of Kobe Bryant and is just not good enough this year to deserve ring number five.
--On the coach front, expert Lakers Coach Phil Jackson has ten rings and Junior Expert Celtics Coach Doc Rivers only one. But Doc Rivers was at least as good as Phil Jackson this particular year, probably better technically, since for one thing he had even more problems to deal with than did Jackson. Doc Rivers deserves Ring number two whereas Phil Jackson's ten is already more than enough for his legacy.
So we like the Boston Celtics to win what will be a truly great series between the class of the NBA, a series almost certain to be at least six games and with a good chance for it to be seven games. Note that we are not predicting the Celtics will win; we just would prefer they would win, but again, either winning is alright from a basketball perspective.
Here is the Head to Head Preview and the two Team Grids for the 2010 Quest for the Ring Final Series. The numbers in the charts are 2009-10 Real Player Ratings for the players. A quick evaluation scale immediately follows the grids. For the full User Guide to Real Player Ratings, see the link at the bottom just above the photo of Rajon Rondo and Doc Rivers.
Below the preview grids I will preview this series further.
If you do not see a spreadsheet just below here, put the web address that you do see in a browser tab and you can view it in a new window.
SCALE FOR REGULAR SEASON REAL PLAYER RATINGS ADJUSTED FOR HIDDEN DEFENDING
Major Historic Super Star / "Perfect Player" 1.100 and more
Historic Super Star 1.000 1.099
Super Star 0.900 0.999
A Star Player / A Well Above Normal Starter 0.820 0.899
Very Good Player / A Solid Starter 0.760 0.819
Major Role Player / Good Enough to Start 0.700 0.759
Good Role Player / Often a Good 6th Man 0.640 0.699
Satisfactory Role Player 0.580 0.639
Marginal Role Player 0.520 0.579
Poor Player 0.460 0.519
Very Poor Player 0.400 0.459
Extremely Poor Player and less 0.399
The full User Guide for Team Grids is here.
AVERAGE RATINGS BY POSITION
Not all positions are created equal. These are estimates for average ratings by position among all NBA players who play 300 minutes or more. There are very few small forwards and shooting guards who don't fit at other positions who are superstars. Most superstars are players who can play point guard, power forward, or center.
Point Guard .780
Shooting Guard .600
Small Forward .650
Power Forward .720
Center .750
ALL NBA PLAYERS (ALL POSITIONS) AVERAGE: .700
NUMBER OF RINGS GOING IN TO THIS SERIES
Alphabetic by first name
Andrew Bynum 1
Brian Scalabrine 1
Derek Fisher 4
Doc Rivers 1
Glen Davis 1
Jordan Farmar 1
Josh Powell 1
Kendrick Perkins 1
Kevin Garnett 1
Kobe Bryant 4
Lamar Odom 1
Marquis Daniels 0
Michael Finley 1
Nate Robinson 0
Pau Gasol 1
Paul Pierce 1
Phil Jackson 10
Rajon Rondo 1
Rasheed Wallace 1
Ray Allen 1
Ron Artest 0
Sasha Vujacic 1
Shannon Brown 0
Shelden Williams 0
Tony Allen 1
2010 CELTICS-LAKERS SERIES PREVIEW DISCUSSION
The thing about historical superstars (greater than 1.000 Real Player Ratings) is that about the only two things that can slow them way down in the playoffs is themselves (which is rare) very heavy doubling and trapping (which is very dangerous to the team doing it because then it's four against three most of the time) and injuries which as I write this do not seem to loom as a big factor in this series.
Doc Rivers can dream about it but Kobe Bryant and Pau Gasol are not going to be stopped or slowed way down by anything the Celtics can do except maybe once in a blue moon. Phil Jackson can dream about it but Rajon Rondo and Kevin Garnett are not going to be stopped or slowed way down by anything the Lakers can do except maybe once in a blue moon. Sure, there will be a quarter here and there where Kendrick Perkins shuts down Gasol and there will be a quarter or two here and there when Kevin Garnett is shut down by Lamar Odom, but these will be temporary things and, on the whole, Bryant, Gasol, Rondo, and Garnett are all going to have between really good and great series.
Kobe Bryant is not going to stop Rajon Rondo from keeping the Celtics very hard to defend with his passing and assisting all the time and neither Ray Allen nor anyone else will be able to stop Kobe Bryant from racking up mega points most of the time. Despite having the best group of three big men, the Lakers are most definitely not going to be able to any extent to contain Kevin Garnett, who is fully recovered from his 2009 injury troubles, especially since Pau Gasol is not quite big or strong enough to go head to head with Garnett and since Andrew Bynum comes to this series with a knee problem which will require surgery in the off season.
Lamar Odom is actually the one Laker who can slow down Garnett enough to swing a close game, but since Odom doesn't start the number of minutes he actually gets to guard Garnett will be fewer than the Lakers would want if they knew what was good for them. In other words I would start Odom, not Bynum, who has the knee problem and is not quite strong enough to contain Garnett even without a knee problem. Odom starting will happen if when Phil Jackson realizes that he needs to maximize the minutes where Odom is guarding Garnett; I suspect it is a "when Jackson realizes" rather than an "if Jackson realizes". Look for Odom to start either from game one or later in the series, especially if the Lakers are behind.
In general though, each team has two historical superstars and the only thing that will stop any of them from having a great series (other than injuries obviously) is themselves. I would not expect any of them to not have an outstanding series which is reason number one why this series will go down to the wire.
THE STARTERS AND BEST “6TH MAN” PLAYERS BROKEN DOWN
Historical superstars are those near perfect players with ratings greater than 1.000. Each team has two of them. The Celtics’ historical superstars Rajon Rondo plus Kevin Garnett combined are at least as good as Lakers historical superstars Pau Gasol plus Kobe Bryant combined and very probably better.
Notice that both teams come in with that perfect two historical superstar combo: one guard and one big man at power forward or center who are both historical superstars. Rondo is point guard and Garnett is power forward for the Celtics. Bryant is combo guard and Gasol is center for the Lakers. They just don't make teams any stronger than this, so this is a series most definitely worth watching.
Kobe Bryant is as you would expect a very good guard defender and he will probably early in the series be out to force Rondo to look to pass more and shoot less than even Rondo himself already wants to do, which is quite a lot to begin with. This may ironically work to Los Angeles' disadvantage, since Rondo is one of the best playmakers the NBA has seen in a long time, whereas his shooting is good but not outstanding. As the series goes along, Bryant may wisely decide to sag off Rondo a little to try to entice Rondo to shoot more, but if Rondo's IQ is as high as they say it is, and/or if Doc Rivers' calls Kobe's bluff, then Rondo will pass all the time anyway and be even more effective at making plays than if Kobe stays up on him all the time. In other words, it looks like it will be a damned if you do and damned if you don't with respect to how closely Kobe Bryant will be guarding Rajon Rondo. Rondo is about like the next Steve Nash but he is out there with one of the very best front courts whereas Nash’ front court was not what Championship teams are made of.
At the next level however, the plain old superstar level, featuring players with Real Player Ratings between .900 and .999, the Lakers are well ahead of the Celtics. Lamar Odom and Andrew Bynum are superstars for the Lakers whereas the Celtics don't have any 2010 superstars. The next two Celtics are on the next rung down. The Celtics have a star in Paul Pierce at small forward and a near star at center in Kendrick Perkins. But in this series, look for Perkins to be so amped defensively that he'll be a star rather than merely a "solid starter".
At the lowest level among the starters and the 6th men, each team will feature two players with ratings below .800. (Remember that the NBA average rating among all players who play 300 minutes or more is .about .700. But averages by position vary from .600 for shooting guard at one extreme to .780 for point guard at the high end.) The Celtics start Ray Allen (.770) at 2-guard and have Rasheed Wallace (.757) as 6th man at center. The Lakers start Derek Fisher (.578) at point guard and they start Ron Artest (.752) at small forward.
Championship teams very often feature some of the best defending guards. Celtics 2-guard Ray Allen is at least as good a guard defender as is Kobe Bryant, but as already alluded to, Kobe Bryant can be slowed down a little but neither Ray Allen nor anyone else will be able to contain Kobe Bryant enough to win more than one game if even that. Offensively, Ray Allen is almost always at least as good at scoring the ball in a playoff series as he was in the regular season (which is really, really good).
By contrast Celtics 6th man center Rasheed Wallace has in recent years become very, very inconsistent offensively. He doesn't do much in the paint anymore and his three-point shooting in particular is often (but not always, fortunately for the Celtics) one extreme or the other. Wallace is fairly likely to win at least one game for the Celtics but is also fairly likely to cost the Celtics a game. In other words, if and when Wallace rains threes the Lakers are most likely going to lose that game whereas if and when Wallace misses all or most of his threes the Lakers are most likely going to win that game.
Lakers small forward Ron Artest is not as inconsistent as Rasheed Wallace is nowadays but is not as dependable as Ray Allen either. Artest has a temper that is like a volcano that you know is going to blow in the near future but you never know for sure if or when. If Artest gets ticked off about something and starts getting technical fouls and/or starts allowing Paul Pierce to score two dozen points plus a game, the Lakers are in real trouble. Artest going off like a volcano is a higher risk than you might think since Artest has no rings yet whereas almost everyone else including Paul Pierce has at least one, which increases the odds that Artest is going to get riled up if things don't go his way.
On the other hand, if Artest can make the threes he likes to make and if he can stay with Pierce without being hammered with fouls by the refs the Lakers will be in great shape. In theory, Artest can guard Pierce fairly well much of the time and very well in a game or two. In practice, it remains to be seen what will actually happen. Especially considering the four historical superstars roughly offset, Artest versus Pierce at the three spot is a major key that will determine who will win this series.
PHIL JACKSON VERSUS DOC RIVERS
Whereas two years ago Doc Rivers was unproven as a great coach before the Celtics beat the Lakers in the Championship, this year he is proven, although still not as heavily armed with “seen it all” experience as is Phil Jackson. Whereas Jackson has more knowledge, Rivers has more soul and thus more pure motivation power. Jackson has an unbelievable amount of basketball intelligence and Rivers has an unbelievable amount of basketball motivation power. But don’t kid yourself, Jackson has a lot of soul and motivational power of his own while Rivers has a lot of knowledge of his own. You have to really like this great at the least and possibly historically great coaching matchup.
RAJON RONDO
Your instructions, should you be big enough to accept them, are to go out there and get your second Ring by doing the same thing you did to bounce LeBron James: play the hell out of the point guard position and prove that it should really be called the power guard position. You were better than Kobe Bryant this year and, for that matter, you were even better than Pau Gasol. Yes, thanks to Real Player Ratings we know for sure here at QFTR that you are the best player in this Championship series! Rondo, the 2010 Ring has your name on it and it will be yours should you choose to accept this challenge and win it.
Quest for the Ring is wanting and waiting for you to make 2010 the year when you, your Coach, and your teammates proved once and for all that either you respect the power point guard concept or you almost certainly will not be winning the Quest. Plus in general your winning will make 2010 a whole hell of a lot better than it is. (Plus you can make George Karl look really bad, and you can make Larry Brown look like a complete idiot for removing Iverson from the point guard position, laugh out loud.)
-----------------------------------------
USER GUIDE
The Real Player Rating User Guide is a necessary reference for anyone who wants to truly understand the value of, the validity of, and the ways you can use the Real Player Rating performance measures. Moreover, you should become a regular visitor to Quest for the Ring if you want to get the full advantage of reading and using Real Player Ratings Series performance measures. The more you visit and check out ratings, the more quickly and easily you will be able to evaluate what you are seeing.
DOC RIVERS AND RAJON RONDO
Choose and click on a report and your tab will reload with that report showing about 1/10 the way down the page, below the two title listing panels just below here.
There are actually many more ways to choose and read Reports. For a complete description of all options, see this User Guide article.
There are actually many more ways to choose and read Reports. For a complete description of all options, see this User Guide article.
Post your response to anything on Quest HERE
GIVE US THE JUICE TO PRODUCE REPORTS MORE QUICKLY
Although there is a guaranteed minimum rate of Report production regardless of traffic, IT IS IN YOUR POWER to help double or triple the number of and frequency of Reports. Simply take two or three minutes as often as you can to recommend Quest and post links to Quest on your favorite sports and other sites. The resulting automatic increase of traffic will in turn increase the resources that go in to producing Quest, which in turn speeds up reporting. If you want, e-mail how you helped (include the url of where you posted a link to Quest) and we will throw some Internet love back to where you tell us on the Internet. Thank you.
Here are some quick links that you can use to find a place where you might post a link to Quest and/or to Quest content.
HOLD MOUSE HERE TO EXPAND THIS MENU OF PLACES ON WHICH YOU CAN POST A LINK TO QUEST:
BASKETBALL SITES THAT ARE OPEN FOR CONTENT FROM ANYONE
Note: Beware of "layered" sites. None of the following are layered sites, which are sites that allow contributions from the public only in hard to find, low traffic areas, while the main areas are off limits for public input and are only for a chosen few. All of the following have at least some notable traffic, and all of them allow relatively equal and open participation. The order is from most recommended to least recommended, based on about half a dozen factors.
Bleacher Report Open Posting Site
Inside Hoops NBA Forum
Real GM NBA and Team Forums
Pro Sports Daily NBA Forum
Basketball Forum NBA Forum
Sporting News NBA Forum
Hoops Hype NBA Forum
Armchair GM Open Posting Site
SportsTwo NBA Forum
NBA Dimensions NBA Forum
OTR Basketball Forums NBA Forum
NBA Boards NBA Forum
NBA Wire NBA Forum
KFFL NBA Forum
Note: there are other forums, but they are all very low traffic and activity compared to the ones above.
MESSAGE BOARDS AT HUGE COROPORATIONS
The Fox NBA board is very low traffic, and the MSNBC NBA board doesn't exist anymore. The CBS Sports NBA Message Board is a layered site; you can NOT post topics nor expect to be considered seriously there until you have spent a few years posting there. We do not recommend CBS Sports. So the only real, fully open NBA forum hosted by a big corporation is the ESPN message board. Be forewarned though that the ESPN board is dominated by very young fans who make very short comments. On the other hand, it is a high traffic site, so we won't stop you from posting a Quest link at ESPN if you want to.
ESPN NBA Message Board
GIVE US THE JUICE TO PRODUCE REPORTS MORE QUICKLY
Although there is a guaranteed minimum rate of Report production regardless of traffic, IT IS IN YOUR POWER to help double or triple the number of and frequency of Reports. Simply take two or three minutes as often as you can to recommend Quest and post links to Quest on your favorite sports and other sites. The resulting automatic increase of traffic will in turn increase the resources that go in to producing Quest, which in turn speeds up reporting. If you want, e-mail how you helped (include the url of where you posted a link to Quest) and we will throw some Internet love back to where you tell us on the Internet. Thank you.
Here are some quick links that you can use to find a place where you might post a link to Quest and/or to Quest content.
HOLD MOUSE HERE TO EXPAND THIS MENU OF PLACES ON WHICH YOU CAN POST A LINK TO QUEST:
BASKETBALL SITES THAT ARE OPEN FOR CONTENT FROM ANYONE
Note: Beware of "layered" sites. None of the following are layered sites, which are sites that allow contributions from the public only in hard to find, low traffic areas, while the main areas are off limits for public input and are only for a chosen few. All of the following have at least some notable traffic, and all of them allow relatively equal and open participation. The order is from most recommended to least recommended, based on about half a dozen factors.
Bleacher Report Open Posting Site
Inside Hoops NBA Forum
Real GM NBA and Team Forums
Pro Sports Daily NBA Forum
Basketball Forum NBA Forum
Sporting News NBA Forum
Hoops Hype NBA Forum
Armchair GM Open Posting Site
SportsTwo NBA Forum
NBA Dimensions NBA Forum
OTR Basketball Forums NBA Forum
NBA Boards NBA Forum
NBA Wire NBA Forum
KFFL NBA Forum
Note: there are other forums, but they are all very low traffic and activity compared to the ones above.
MESSAGE BOARDS AT HUGE COROPORATIONS
The Fox NBA board is very low traffic, and the MSNBC NBA board doesn't exist anymore. The CBS Sports NBA Message Board is a layered site; you can NOT post topics nor expect to be considered seriously there until you have spent a few years posting there. We do not recommend CBS Sports. So the only real, fully open NBA forum hosted by a big corporation is the ESPN message board. Be forewarned though that the ESPN board is dominated by very young fans who make very short comments. On the other hand, it is a high traffic site, so we won't stop you from posting a Quest link at ESPN if you want to.
ESPN NBA Message Board
>>>I WANT TO STICK WITH THE WAY OTHER SITES PRESENT POSTS
Due to the number of, uniqueness of, and importance of the many other home page features we have, only one Report loads at a time, currently the one just above. To see the next Report (which would be the one that came out just before the one above) on this home page, click "Older Posts" that is at the very bottom of the Report showing above, just above the section header "Your Ball: Take Your Best Shot".
>>ALTERNATIVE HOME PAGES
There are three home pages, all of which have all of the Reports but which have completely different features appearing on the sidebar and below the one Report that is shown at a time. These pages have been designed so that they fully load in about 10 seconds (no more super long load times we used to be known for.)
HOME PAGE A: ALL REPORTS, READERS CONTAINING REPORTS 1-100, AND UNIQUE FEATURES
HOME PAGE B: ALL REPORTS, READERS CONTAINING REPORTS 1-100, AND UNIQUE FEATURES
HOME PAGE C: ALL REPORTS, READERS CONTAINING REPORTS 1-100, AND UNIQUE FEATURES
>>REPORT READERS: Complete freedom to rapidly choose and read what you need or want to read. The latest 40 Reports are found near the top of all three of the primary home pages (linked to just above) while Reports #41-#100 are found in three separate readers placed at various points down the page on all three primary home pages.
>>EXPRESS VERSION: Every Single Report but no Features: a Fast Loading Page: Click Here
>>FAST BREAK VERSION: The Latest 100 Reports via Report Readers Only; no Features, a Fast Loading Page: Click Here
>>QUEST ARCHIVE HOME PAGES--REPORT ARCHIVES AND A SMALL NUMBER OF CLASSIC FEATURES THAT WON'T FIT ON OTHER HOME PAGES
QUEST 4: REPORTS 101-200
QUEST 5: REPORTS 201-300
QUEST 6: REPORTS 301-400
QUEST 7: REPORTS 401-500
QUEST 8: REPORTS 501-600
QUEST 9: REPORTS 601-700
QUEST 10: REPORTS 701-800
>>FEATURES ONLY HOME PAGES: NO REPORTS, JUST FEATURES THAT WE CAN'T FIT ANYWHERE ELSE
QUEST OVERTIME
QUEST CLASSIC
>>COMPLETE TITLE INDEX: : A Complete Report Title Index, with Express Version Links to all Reports
>>LATEST 25 Reports: Direct links to the latest 25 Reports (with no truncated titles as you find with the poorly designed Google archive). This is located near the very bottom of this page.
>>GOOGLE ARCHIVE you will find this, with Reports shown by week not very far below.
>>I'M NEW AND I DON'T KNOW WHERE I WANT TO GO: Welcome to the Real Zone. Simply browse the page and see for yourself what is here. You will not be disappointed.
>>OR YOU CAN DO A CUSTOM GOOGLE SEARCH OF THE 13 BOOKS AND COUNTING CONTAINED ON THIS SITE>>>>>
Due to the number of, uniqueness of, and importance of the many other home page features we have, only one Report loads at a time, currently the one just above. To see the next Report (which would be the one that came out just before the one above) on this home page, click "Older Posts" that is at the very bottom of the Report showing above, just above the section header "Your Ball: Take Your Best Shot".
>>ALTERNATIVE HOME PAGES
There are three home pages, all of which have all of the Reports but which have completely different features appearing on the sidebar and below the one Report that is shown at a time. These pages have been designed so that they fully load in about 10 seconds (no more super long load times we used to be known for.)
HOME PAGE A: ALL REPORTS, READERS CONTAINING REPORTS 1-100, AND UNIQUE FEATURES
HOME PAGE B: ALL REPORTS, READERS CONTAINING REPORTS 1-100, AND UNIQUE FEATURES
HOME PAGE C: ALL REPORTS, READERS CONTAINING REPORTS 1-100, AND UNIQUE FEATURES
>>REPORT READERS: Complete freedom to rapidly choose and read what you need or want to read. The latest 40 Reports are found near the top of all three of the primary home pages (linked to just above) while Reports #41-#100 are found in three separate readers placed at various points down the page on all three primary home pages.
>>EXPRESS VERSION: Every Single Report but no Features: a Fast Loading Page: Click Here
>>FAST BREAK VERSION: The Latest 100 Reports via Report Readers Only; no Features, a Fast Loading Page: Click Here
>>QUEST ARCHIVE HOME PAGES--REPORT ARCHIVES AND A SMALL NUMBER OF CLASSIC FEATURES THAT WON'T FIT ON OTHER HOME PAGES
QUEST 4: REPORTS 101-200
QUEST 5: REPORTS 201-300
QUEST 6: REPORTS 301-400
QUEST 7: REPORTS 401-500
QUEST 8: REPORTS 501-600
QUEST 9: REPORTS 601-700
QUEST 10: REPORTS 701-800
>>FEATURES ONLY HOME PAGES: NO REPORTS, JUST FEATURES THAT WE CAN'T FIT ANYWHERE ELSE
QUEST OVERTIME
QUEST CLASSIC
>>COMPLETE TITLE INDEX: : A Complete Report Title Index, with Express Version Links to all Reports
>>LATEST 25 Reports: Direct links to the latest 25 Reports (with no truncated titles as you find with the poorly designed Google archive). This is located near the very bottom of this page.
>>GOOGLE ARCHIVE you will find this, with Reports shown by week not very far below.
>>I'M NEW AND I DON'T KNOW WHERE I WANT TO GO: Welcome to the Real Zone. Simply browse the page and see for yourself what is here. You will not be disappointed.
>>OR YOU CAN DO A CUSTOM GOOGLE SEARCH OF THE 13 BOOKS AND COUNTING CONTAINED ON THIS SITE>>>>>
SEARCH THE QUEST FOR THE RING--THE EQUIVALENT OF MORE THAN 13 BOOKS ABOUT BASKETBALL
Custom Search
SEARCH THE 13 BOOKS / 1.3 MILLION WORDSNBA LATEST 2010 PLAYOFFS VIDEOS
NOTES ABOUT VIDEOS: Some videos below appear only due to "spam tagging" and should be ignored; hover your mouse on the thumbs at the right to select videos.
iDesktop.tv
LATEST LOS ANGELES LAKERS VIDEOS
iDesktop.tv
THE LATEST CLEVELAND CAVALIERS VIDEOS
iDesktop.tv
THE QUEST FOR THE RING EMAIL ADDRESS
SITE E-MAIL
The site email address is the webmaster email address: nuggets1nuggets. This is a gmail address, so you add @gmail.com after the nuggets1nuggets. Use this email address to contact Nuggets 1 for any reason. If you are smart enough to know how basketball games are won, and you want to get promoted, nicely formatted space for you to publish your winning in basketball writing, by all means write to the above address. Alternatively, you can also comment or instantly publish your writing, by visiting and posting here.
The site email address is the webmaster email address: nuggets1nuggets. This is a gmail address, so you add @gmail.com after the nuggets1nuggets. Use this email address to contact Nuggets 1 for any reason. If you are smart enough to know how basketball games are won, and you want to get promoted, nicely formatted space for you to publish your winning in basketball writing, by all means write to the above address. Alternatively, you can also comment or instantly publish your writing, by visiting and posting here.
QUEST REPORTS #41 TO #60, GOING BACK IN TIME
QUALIFICATIONS OF THE PRIMARY WRITER
The basketball expert and maniac who writes most of this site doesn't know how to stop until he has said and proved it all. So we are simply in a League of our own, and much of this unique content is for truly serious basketball people. The Quest for the Ring primary writer has two college degrees, one in Economics and one in Accounting. Both were with high honors and straight A grades. He played basketball in high school mostly because he was so tall at an early age but, unfortunately, he didn't have squat for athletic skills. Is that why he respects players more than other writers do? Probably so. In any event, he has been very closely following pro basketball for more than a dozen years. He has been extremely closely following the NBA in general and the Denver Nuggets in particular for over 4 years now. He has been learning the Detroit Pistons in great detail since the Iverson trade. He learns fast.
QUEST LOADING TIMES, RELOADING, AND BROWSER USAGE
LOADING OUR LOADED PAGE: The Nuggets 1 Main Page is chock loaded and needs time to load from sometimes sluggish or clunky Google servers. You may not be able to scroll properly while the page is loading. Links, including unfortunately the jump link to the latest content, may not work until the page is done or almost done loading. Please be patient and let it load. Your own computer system contains many variables that also determine how long it takes for Quest for the Ring to fully load. For example, how many programs and other sites are already up and running on your computer, and whether you have recently cleaned your temporary internet history and related caches will help determine how long it takes for the page to long.
Despite great variations, we will make estimates of how long the Quest home page will need to fully load. The following time are for those with reasonably healthy and not overburdened systems. With a fast broadband connection, generally a cable connection in the USA, the page will load in full in about 30-60 seconds. It will take 50-120 seconds to load with slower broadband connections, generally dsl in the USA. In Europe and Japan, my understanding is that dsl connections are frequently much faster than they are in the USA, so it would be less time for dsl in Europe and Japan. With a dial-up connection, the Quest home page might take 1-2.5 minutes to load, so just go on to something else and come back in about 2 minutes would be my advice if you are loading the page with a slow dial-up connection.
However you are assessing Quest, it is well worth the wait, so please try to be patient and let it load. Remember, most good things require at least a little bit of patience.
RELOADING WILL BE NECESSARY SOMETIMES
Every once in a while, parts of the page will not load. You will notice some things missing. If this happens, normally, if you click refresh and reload the page, you will get a complete loading and it will be a quicker loading than the original loading was. Having said that, you will find if you are a very heavy internet user that at any given time, if you have more than one browser available to you, that different browsers may load a loaded page such as this differently, with perhaps only one browser loading the page in full and other browsers failing to load one or more elements.
BROWSERS
All major users of the internet eventually realize that they must have at least 2 browsers, because browsers gradually become less reliable as time goes by, and because even if a browser is freshly downloaded, it may not properly load certain internet pages, whereas another browser will. If you notice open spaces on Quest (or any other website) even after reloading the page, you may need to try a different browser in order to more fully view that page. At this time, the Quest finds that any of the following browsers are able to fully, or at least almost fully, load Quest for the Ring pages: We recommend all of the following equally:
Internet Explorer
Mozilla Firefox
Safari
Despite great variations, we will make estimates of how long the Quest home page will need to fully load. The following time are for those with reasonably healthy and not overburdened systems. With a fast broadband connection, generally a cable connection in the USA, the page will load in full in about 30-60 seconds. It will take 50-120 seconds to load with slower broadband connections, generally dsl in the USA. In Europe and Japan, my understanding is that dsl connections are frequently much faster than they are in the USA, so it would be less time for dsl in Europe and Japan. With a dial-up connection, the Quest home page might take 1-2.5 minutes to load, so just go on to something else and come back in about 2 minutes would be my advice if you are loading the page with a slow dial-up connection.
However you are assessing Quest, it is well worth the wait, so please try to be patient and let it load. Remember, most good things require at least a little bit of patience.
RELOADING WILL BE NECESSARY SOMETIMES
Every once in a while, parts of the page will not load. You will notice some things missing. If this happens, normally, if you click refresh and reload the page, you will get a complete loading and it will be a quicker loading than the original loading was. Having said that, you will find if you are a very heavy internet user that at any given time, if you have more than one browser available to you, that different browsers may load a loaded page such as this differently, with perhaps only one browser loading the page in full and other browsers failing to load one or more elements.
BROWSERS
All major users of the internet eventually realize that they must have at least 2 browsers, because browsers gradually become less reliable as time goes by, and because even if a browser is freshly downloaded, it may not properly load certain internet pages, whereas another browser will. If you notice open spaces on Quest (or any other website) even after reloading the page, you may need to try a different browser in order to more fully view that page. At this time, the Quest finds that any of the following browsers are able to fully, or at least almost fully, load Quest for the Ring pages: We recommend all of the following equally:
Internet Explorer
Mozilla Firefox
Safari