Choose and click on a report and your tab will reload with that report showing about 1/10 the way down the page, below the two title listing panels just below here.

There are actually many more ways to choose and read Reports. For a complete description of all options, see this User Guide article.

Thursday, February 19, 2009

Why the Pistons are Losing so Many Games, and Why They Might Win a Playoff Series Anyway

With the Pistons losing much more frequently this year than last year, lets see what reasons we can spot by comparing the Real Player Ratings and the Defending Sub Ratings.

DETROIT PISTONS REAL PLAYER RATINGS
2007-08 REGULAR SEASON: LAST YEAR

Chauncey Billups 0.930
Rasheed Wallace 0.793
Amir Johnson 0.761
Richard Hamilton 0.734
Tayshaun Prince 0.724
Rodney Stuckey 0.648
Antonio McDyess 0.648
Jason Maxiell 0.620
Ronald Murray 0.586
Jarvis Hayes 0.531
Arron Afflalo 0.486

DETROIT PISTONS REAL PLAYER RATINGS
2008-09 REGULAR SEASON: THIS YEAR
Through Feb. 8, 2009

Rodney Stuckey 0.800
Allen Iverson 0.753
Antonio McDyess 0.736
Rasheed Wallace 0.721
Tayshaun Prince 0.715
Amir Johnson 0.704
Richard Hamilton 0.673
Kwame Brown 0.580
Jason Maxiell 0.560
Arron Afflalo 0.349

SCALE FOR THE ABOVE RATINGS

Perfect Player? Is there Such a Thing? 1.000 and more
Historic Super Star 0.950 and more
Super Star 0.850 0.949
A Star Player: An Outstanding, Above Normal Starter 0.775 0.849
A Very Good Player: A Solid Starter 0.700 0.774
Major Role Player 0.650 0.699
Role Player 0.600 0.649
Minor Role Player 0.550 0.599
Very Minor Role Player 0.500 0.549
Poor Player at This Time 0.450 0.499
Very Poor Player at This Time 0.350 0.449
Extremely Poor Player at This Time / Disaster and less 0.349

+++++++++ DEFENDING ========================

DETROIT PISTONS OVERALL DEFENDING SUB RATING
2007-08 REGULAR SEASON: LAST YEAR

Amir Johnson 0.468
Rasheed Wallace 0.453
Antonio McDyess 0.337
Tayshaun Prince 0.335
Arron Afflalo 0.275
Rodney Stuckey 0.270
Chauncey Billups 0.264
Jason Maxiell 0.245
Richard Hamilton 0.185
Jarvis Hayes 0.151
Ronald Murray† 0.124

DETROIT PISTONS OVERALL DEFENDING SUB RATING
2008-09 REGULAR SEASON
Through Feb. 8, 2009: THIS YEAR

Amir Johnson 0.533
Kwame Brown 0.499
Rasheed Wallace 0.468
Antonio McDyess 0.429
Allen Iverson† 0.422
Rodney Stuckey 0.398
Tayshaun Prince 0.371
Richard Hamilton 0.223
Jason Maxiell 0.191
Arron Afflalo 0.118

OBSERVATIONS
1. Rasheed Wallace is down substantially from last year to this year; last year he was in the star range and this year he's in the solid starter range.
2. At Point Guard, Chauncey Billups was substantially better last year than Rodney Stuckey is this year. At the same time though, Stuckey is far better this year than he was last year.
3. Richard Hamilton is down about the same amount as Wallace is; he has dropped from the solid starter range last year to the major role player range this year.
4. Aaron Afflalo is down big from last year to this year. He has dropped from the high end of the poor range last year to the border between very poor and extremely poor this year.
5. Amir Johnson has dropped from .761 to .704 this year; from the high end to the low end of the solid starter category.
6. Tayshaun Prince is down very slightly from last year to this year.
7. Jason Maxiell is down from .620 to .560, a substantial drop. Last year he was in the role player zone and this year he is in the minor role player zone.
8. Aside from Rodney Stuckey, who is up from .648 to .800, the only other Pistons player from last year who is better this year is Antonio McDyess. He was .648 last year and is .736 this year, a very nice increase. Last year he was on the border between role player and major role player, while this year he is in the solid starter range.

In summary, among the eight Pistons who were on the team both last year and htis year, only two are playing better this year: McDyess and Stuckey. One is about the same: Prince. And the other five out of the eight are down substantially from last year to this year: Wallace, Hamilton, Afflalo, Johnson, and Maxiell.

Now I know from internet experience that the Iverson haters will take great delight in blaming all of this on Allen Iverson. Somehow, to them it will be his fault that these five players are not playing as well as they did in recent years including last year. But of course unless Iverson is an alien from outer space who can take control of other players, he could not possibly have caused this, especially considering that he himself is down from last year as a Nugget, on account of being asked to reduce his offensive game so that the Pistons can maintain their heavy team focus and avoid being swamped by Iverson taking too many shots. So if the Iverson haters try to blame the Pistons being down on Iverson, they will, as is common actually, be making fools of themselves.

What are the reasons why the down Pistons are down? I would wager that having a rookie coach has been a partial cause, but there would probably have to be other reasons as well, reasons that are specific to each case.

To start with, Wallace is getting up in years now. He will be 35 years old in September.

Hamilton has taken many weeks to get into any rhythm, because his great chemistry with Chauncey Billups from several recent years was disrupted. Since Iverson plays both guard positions at once, and Hamilton much prefers a traditional point guard, Hamilton has especially sufferred while sharing the back court with The Answer. Even with Stuckey, thuogh, Hamilton did not play all that well in the first few weeks of this season. Lately, he is playing better with both Iverson and Stuckey, more so with Stuckey.

Aaron Afflalo's defending has gone down and become a big liablility to the team this year. His offense is not down by as much, but quite honestly it wasn't all that great last year either.

PF Amir Johnson is actually a better defender this year than last year, which means that his offense is down by a big amount. If Coach Michael Curry were wise, he would in practices work on the Stuckey / Johnson connection. Find out Amir Johnson's most effective ways to score and make sure Stuckey knows about them and can help him score. If this is not done, the Pistons may not be able to win a playoff series, since the Pistons need all of the offensive juicing they can get.

It's almost creepy, but PF-C Jason Maxiell is doiwn by almost exactly the same amount as are the other four Pistons who are down from last year to this year.. Maxiell's decline from last year to this year is due mostly to a decline in his defending, even though his defending was not very good last year to begin with. In fact, Maxiell's defending is the main reason why he is not as good a player as is Amir Johnson.

Despite the fact that the Pistons are still a good defensive team, there are three players who are not very good defenders this year: Hamilton, Afflalo, and Maxiell. Hamilton gets a pass from heavy criticism since he is such a great offensive players.

All in all, it's a major down year in Detroit. With five of eight Pistons down and only two of eight up, and with Iverson down from his historical averages by design, the Pistons are going to need to ramp things up if they are to win a playoff series or two. In future days and weeks, I will be getting into more things they can do to be able to win in the playoffs.

BUT WAIT, LET'S LOOK AT THINGS OPTIMISTICALLY
I will now demonstrate why the Pistons may be able to easily win a playoff series, and why they could win two and be in the East finals.

SUMMARY OF CHANGE FROM LAST YEAR TO THIS YEAR FOR 8 PISTONS
Wallace DOWN .793 TO .721
Hamilton DOWN .734 TO .673
Johnson DOWN .761 TO .704
Maxiell DOWN .620 TO .560
Afflalo DOWN .486 to .349

Prince SAME .724 TO .715

Stuckey UP .648 TO .800
McDyess UP .648 TO .736

So the "record" for the team is 2-5-1, if wins are gains and losses are drops.

If any one of the five who are down were to, regardless of how much down in the regular season, be up for the playoffs, and if every other player remained about the same, then the "record" would be 3-4-1, not much different from last year. Or, if any two were just to return to where they were last year, the "record would be 2-3-3, once again not much different from last year. And then the Iverson factor could put the Pistons over the top into the "deep in the playoffs zone".

So it is silly to give up now and say the Pistons have no chance to win a series or two this year. The basic problem for the Pistons is that too many players are down from last year to this year, which is actually not as bad a problem as it seems, because obviously the situation might change late in the regular and/or for the playoffs, since there are five players who we know can play much better than they have been.

Specifically, it probably comes down to Wallace, Hamilton, and Johnson, with Hamilton's scoring and Johnson's offense being the most promising areas that the Pistons could improve in enough to win a playoff series. But heck, even Afflalo coming up from the depths and getting some burn could help as well.

Contrary to what you may be thinking, this Pistons situation is a better situation than the Nuggets have, as well as being an almost opposite situation. The Nuggets' players are more up than down, especially if you expand the look to include players who were not on the team last year. The Nuggets have several players who have never in history played as well as they are playing this year, which sounds nice, but it's only the regular season, which is different in many ways from the playoff season. Whereas the regular season has been a big surprise, but not a science fiction type of surprise, in the real world, the Nuggets are not going to win a playoff series unless these never this good before players continue to be way, way above expectations and above history in the playoffs, which would be a truly science fiction type event.



BallHype: hype it up!




You Can Post Your Response to Anything on Quest Here

Post your response to anything on Quest HERE

GIVE US THE JUICE TO PRODUCE REPORTS MORE QUICKLY

Although there is a guaranteed minimum rate of Report production regardless of traffic, IT IS IN YOUR POWER to help double or triple the number of and frequency of Reports. Simply take two or three minutes as often as you can to recommend Quest and post links to Quest on your favorite sports and other sites. The resulting automatic increase of traffic will in turn increase the resources that go in to producing Quest, which in turn speeds up reporting. If you want, e-mail how you helped (include the url of where you posted a link to Quest) and we will throw some Internet love back to where you tell us on the Internet. Thank you.

Here are some quick links that you can use to find a place where you might post a link to Quest and/or to Quest content.

Share/Bookmark


HOLD MOUSE HERE TO EXPAND THIS MENU OF PLACES ON WHICH YOU CAN POST A LINK TO QUEST:




BASKETBALL SITES THAT ARE OPEN FOR CONTENT FROM ANYONE
Note: Beware of "layered" sites. None of the following are layered sites, which are sites that allow contributions from the public only in hard to find, low traffic areas, while the main areas are off limits for public input and are only for a chosen few. All of the following have at least some notable traffic, and all of them allow relatively equal and open participation. The order is from most recommended to least recommended, based on about half a dozen factors.

Bleacher Report Open Posting Site
Inside Hoops NBA Forum
Real GM NBA and Team Forums
Pro Sports Daily NBA Forum
Basketball Forum NBA Forum
Sporting News NBA Forum
Hoops Hype NBA Forum
Armchair GM Open Posting Site
SportsTwo NBA Forum
NBA Dimensions NBA Forum
OTR Basketball Forums NBA Forum
NBA Boards NBA Forum
NBA Wire NBA Forum
KFFL NBA Forum

Note: there are other forums, but they are all very low traffic and activity compared to the ones above.

MESSAGE BOARDS AT HUGE COROPORATIONS
The Fox NBA board is very low traffic, and the MSNBC NBA board doesn't exist anymore. The CBS Sports NBA Message Board is a layered site; you can NOT post topics nor expect to be considered seriously there until you have spent a few years posting there. We do not recommend CBS Sports. So the only real, fully open NBA forum hosted by a big corporation is the ESPN message board. Be forewarned though that the ESPN board is dominated by very young fans who make very short comments. On the other hand, it is a high traffic site, so we won't stop you from posting a Quest link at ESPN if you want to.

ESPN NBA Message Board

>>>I WANT TO STICK WITH THE WAY OTHER SITES PRESENT POSTS
Due to the number of, uniqueness of, and importance of the many other home page features we have, only one Report loads at a time, currently the one just above. To see the next Report (which would be the one that came out just before the one above) on this home page, click "Older Posts" that is at the very bottom of the Report showing above, just above the section header "Your Ball: Take Your Best Shot".

>>ALTERNATIVE HOME PAGES
There are three home pages, all of which have all of the Reports but which have completely different features appearing on the sidebar and below the one Report that is shown at a time. These pages have been designed so that they fully load in about 10 seconds (no more super long load times we used to be known for.)

HOME PAGE A: ALL REPORTS, READERS CONTAINING REPORTS 1-100, AND UNIQUE FEATURES
HOME PAGE B: ALL REPORTS, READERS CONTAINING REPORTS 1-100, AND UNIQUE FEATURES
HOME PAGE C: ALL REPORTS, READERS CONTAINING REPORTS 1-100, AND UNIQUE FEATURES

>>REPORT READERS: Complete freedom to rapidly choose and read what you need or want to read. The latest 40 Reports are found near the top of all three of the primary home pages (linked to just above) while Reports #41-#100 are found in three separate readers placed at various points down the page on all three primary home pages.

>>EXPRESS VERSION: Every Single Report but no Features: a Fast Loading Page: Click Here

>>FAST BREAK VERSION: The Latest 100 Reports via Report Readers Only; no Features, a Fast Loading Page: Click Here

>>QUEST ARCHIVE HOME PAGES--REPORT ARCHIVES AND A SMALL NUMBER OF CLASSIC FEATURES THAT WON'T FIT ON OTHER HOME PAGES
QUEST 4: REPORTS 101-200
QUEST 5: REPORTS 201-300
QUEST 6: REPORTS 301-400
QUEST 7: REPORTS 401-500
QUEST 8: REPORTS 501-600
QUEST 9: REPORTS 601-700
QUEST 10: REPORTS 701-800

>>FEATURES ONLY HOME PAGES: NO REPORTS, JUST FEATURES THAT WE CAN'T FIT ANYWHERE ELSE
QUEST OVERTIME
QUEST CLASSIC

>>COMPLETE TITLE INDEX: : A Complete Report Title Index, with Express Version Links to all Reports

>>LATEST 25 Reports: Direct links to the latest 25 Reports (with no truncated titles as you find with the poorly designed Google archive). This is located near the very bottom of this page.

>>GOOGLE ARCHIVE you will find this, with Reports shown by week not very far below.

>>I'M NEW AND I DON'T KNOW WHERE I WANT TO GO: Welcome to the Real Zone. Simply browse the page and see for yourself what is here. You will not be disappointed.

>>OR YOU CAN DO A CUSTOM GOOGLE SEARCH OF THE 13 BOOKS AND COUNTING CONTAINED ON THIS SITE>>>>>

SEARCH THE QUEST FOR THE RING--THE EQUIVALENT OF MORE THAN 13 BOOKS ABOUT BASKETBALL

Custom Search
SEARCH THE 13 BOOKS / 1.3 MILLION WORDS

NBA LATEST 2010 PLAYOFFS VIDEOS

NOTES ABOUT VIDEOS: Some videos below appear only due to "spam tagging" and should be ignored; hover your mouse on the thumbs at the right to select videos.
iDesktop.tv

LATEST LOS ANGELES LAKERS VIDEOS

iDesktop.tv

THE LATEST CLEVELAND CAVALIERS VIDEOS

iDesktop.tv

THE QUEST FOR THE RING EMAIL ADDRESS

SITE E-MAIL
The site email address is the webmaster email address: nuggets1nuggets. This is a gmail address, so you add @gmail.com after the nuggets1nuggets. Use this email address to contact Nuggets 1 for any reason. If you are smart enough to know how basketball games are won, and you want to get promoted, nicely formatted space for you to publish your winning in basketball writing, by all means write to the above address. Alternatively, you can also comment or instantly publish your writing, by visiting and posting here.

QUEST REPORTS #41 TO #60, GOING BACK IN TIME

QUALIFICATIONS OF THE PRIMARY WRITER

The basketball expert and maniac who writes most of this site doesn't know how to stop until he has said and proved it all. So we are simply in a League of our own, and much of this unique content is for truly serious basketball people. The Quest for the Ring primary writer has two college degrees, one in Economics and one in Accounting. Both were with high honors and straight A grades. He played basketball in high school mostly because he was so tall at an early age but, unfortunately, he didn't have squat for athletic skills. Is that why he respects players more than other writers do? Probably so. In any event, he has been very closely following pro basketball for more than a dozen years. He has been extremely closely following the NBA in general and the Denver Nuggets in particular for over 4 years now. He has been learning the Detroit Pistons in great detail since the Iverson trade. He learns fast.

QUEST LOADING TIMES, RELOADING, AND BROWSER USAGE

LOADING OUR LOADED PAGE: The Nuggets 1 Main Page is chock loaded and needs time to load from sometimes sluggish or clunky Google servers. You may not be able to scroll properly while the page is loading. Links, including unfortunately the jump link to the latest content, may not work until the page is done or almost done loading. Please be patient and let it load. Your own computer system contains many variables that also determine how long it takes for Quest for the Ring to fully load. For example, how many programs and other sites are already up and running on your computer, and whether you have recently cleaned your temporary internet history and related caches will help determine how long it takes for the page to long.

Despite great variations, we will make estimates of how long the Quest home page will need to fully load. The following time are for those with reasonably healthy and not overburdened systems. With a fast broadband connection, generally a cable connection in the USA, the page will load in full in about 30-60 seconds. It will take 50-120 seconds to load with slower broadband connections, generally dsl in the USA. In Europe and Japan, my understanding is that dsl connections are frequently much faster than they are in the USA, so it would be less time for dsl in Europe and Japan. With a dial-up connection, the Quest home page might take 1-2.5 minutes to load, so just go on to something else and come back in about 2 minutes would be my advice if you are loading the page with a slow dial-up connection.

However you are assessing Quest, it is well worth the wait, so please try to be patient and let it load. Remember, most good things require at least a little bit of patience.

RELOADING WILL BE NECESSARY SOMETIMES
Every once in a while, parts of the page will not load. You will notice some things missing. If this happens, normally, if you click refresh and reload the page, you will get a complete loading and it will be a quicker loading than the original loading was. Having said that, you will find if you are a very heavy internet user that at any given time, if you have more than one browser available to you, that different browsers may load a loaded page such as this differently, with perhaps only one browser loading the page in full and other browsers failing to load one or more elements.

BROWSERS
All major users of the internet eventually realize that they must have at least 2 browsers, because browsers gradually become less reliable as time goes by, and because even if a browser is freshly downloaded, it may not properly load certain internet pages, whereas another browser will. If you notice open spaces on Quest (or any other website) even after reloading the page, you may need to try a different browser in order to more fully view that page. At this time, the Quest finds that any of the following browsers are able to fully, or at least almost fully, load Quest for the Ring pages: We recommend all of the following equally:

Internet Explorer
Mozilla Firefox
Safari

QUEST REPORTS #61 TO #80, GOING BACK IN TIME

CHAUNCEY BILLUPS JUNE 2004

CHAUNCEY BILLUPS JUNE 2004

QUEST REPORTS #81 TO #100, GOING BACK IN TIME